Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Imagined Geographies
Reynolds uses metaphors from postmodern geography, such as the frontier, to inform our understanding of space as transparent. She believes that technology encourages time-space compression and masks the politics of space. According to Reynolds, there is a need to address the imbalance of power that is apparent in the spaces where writing takes place. In other words, the illusions of overcoming spatial barriers and having more time camouflage the material conditions of writing and writing instructors. She emphasizes that the location, the environment, and the surroundings affect the product (the writing).
Nedra Reynolds
Reynolds’ touches upon ideas that we, as writing teachers, experience everyday without giving it much thought. For example, when I finish teaching on Monday and Wednesday and after a very long day that ends at 9 pm, I go home to rest and I make the “fatal” mistake of checking my email before going to bed. I notice emails from students. Some had to miss the class and need to know what they missed; others need more instructions on writing their essays, and a third group needs a quick reply to their questions. As any other teacher, I feel the need to respond. With each e-mail I read, there is a sense of urgency, a feeling that I need to respond as soon as possible. You won’t believe this, but I get emails from students 20 minutes before class asking me questions about their homework that is due in 20 minutes! My students don’t know about my material conditions and with the help of technology, teachers are reachable and accessible 24 hours a day. The capitalist idea, as Reynolds describes it, that “workers can be productive from “anywhere” at “any time” (31), puts us at the students’ disposal.
However, viewing space as transparent allowed me to travel in my place piece to three places: my father’s garden in Jordan, My grandfather’s hometown in Palestine, and my balcony in Athens, Ohio. With the aid of the visuals and technology, my audience is capable of experiencing these places with me.
I couldn’t compose on the blog immediately. I had to do it on a word document and then copy and paste it to the blog. I like to see a page in front of me with its borders and margins. It gives me great satisfaction to fill the boundaries of space with words rather than blogging directly, filling in a space without borders, without a sense of an end. This “spatial disorientation,” as Bolter calls it, is one of the challenges of electronic writing, but I relate it specifically to writing on the blog (Reynolds 15).
Reading Reynolds’ piece raised some questions for me about the importance of embracing spatial metaphors in our discipline. Are they restrictive or productive? Do we really need them? Is it a way to complicate special theories in composition studies? If so, does that indicate that our discipline is not complicated enough?
Thursday, May 20, 2010
"Out of Place"
Twenty years ago, my parents had to decide whether to buy an elegant modern house in a crowded area in the capital of Jordan, Amman, or a moderate house away from the pollution and the noise of the city on top of a hill with front and back gardens. Because both my parents are nature lovers and grew up in houses that had gardens and clean air, they chose the latter. For many Jordanians, having a garden in a desert-like country is a privilege that many long for.
Wadi Rum: Experience The Desert Life in Jordan
Although rich with tourist attractions, Jordan lacks water resources and green areas. When spring comes, Jordanians invade parks looking for a green spot and the shadow of a tree to have their picnics. My parents wanted to stay in the comfort of their home, enjoying their parcel of nature.
From day one, Dad took care of the front garden. I grew up watching him bond with it. I touched its petunias and pansies, and smelled the roses, and enjoyed Dad’s company in that tiny space. It gives him great satisfaction to dig in its soil, and plant the seeds, waiting endlessly for them to blossom. He taught me how to prepare the soil to receive the flowers, how gently to overturn the soil, and how deep to dig the bed for the new seeds. Every flower in Dad’s garden has a story that we all know since he doesn’t spare us the details. He tells us how his pansies are special because they reseed themselves and come back the next year stronger than before. They prosper under partial sun and sometimes show their faces during the winter.
Because I have been in the US for a couple of years now, I can no longer see the garden; however, I can feel my dad’s excitement and enthusiasm whenever it’s time to redecorate it. When we talk on Skype, my dad fills me in on his garden's progress. He takes the laptop to his garden, narrates the story of each flower, and explains to me the importance of careful planning and commitment:
The harmony of his voice with the music of his garden travels across continents, wireless, effortless, to my living room in Athens, Ohio. Our virtual places merge.
Dad’s garden is so dear to my heart because it reminds me of the wonderful memories we had. It’s the ultimate manifestation of home, happiness, and family. My sister and I planted seeds every winter. Season after season, we smelled the daffodils and danced with the butterflies in the garden. These tiny dwellers of the natural world with their rainbow wings captured our imagination forever. We sketched the shapes of the garden’s almost heart-shaped pansies and the overlapping petals in nature-like colors, then compared our drawings to the original flowers.
We were not the only ones to enjoy the garden. My mother put her favorite fountain in the middle of that tiny garden. Click on the icon below to listen to the water fountain
Wadi Rum: Experience The Desert Life in Jordan
Although rich with tourist attractions, Jordan lacks water resources and green areas. When spring comes, Jordanians invade parks looking for a green spot and the shadow of a tree to have their picnics. My parents wanted to stay in the comfort of their home, enjoying their parcel of nature.
From day one, Dad took care of the front garden. I grew up watching him bond with it. I touched its petunias and pansies, and smelled the roses, and enjoyed Dad’s company in that tiny space. It gives him great satisfaction to dig in its soil, and plant the seeds, waiting endlessly for them to blossom. He taught me how to prepare the soil to receive the flowers, how gently to overturn the soil, and how deep to dig the bed for the new seeds. Every flower in Dad’s garden has a story that we all know since he doesn’t spare us the details. He tells us how his pansies are special because they reseed themselves and come back the next year stronger than before. They prosper under partial sun and sometimes show their faces during the winter.
Because I have been in the US for a couple of years now, I can no longer see the garden; however, I can feel my dad’s excitement and enthusiasm whenever it’s time to redecorate it. When we talk on Skype, my dad fills me in on his garden's progress. He takes the laptop to his garden, narrates the story of each flower, and explains to me the importance of careful planning and commitment:
“It takes time for things to mature in nature. It takes patience.”
“You see, dear, the long flowers are against the back wall and the little ones are at the front. Here, they will get the most sun because they will not be over shadowed."
The harmony of his voice with the music of his garden travels across continents, wireless, effortless, to my living room in Athens, Ohio. Our virtual places merge.
Dad’s garden is so dear to my heart because it reminds me of the wonderful memories we had. It’s the ultimate manifestation of home, happiness, and family. My sister and I planted seeds every winter. Season after season, we smelled the daffodils and danced with the butterflies in the garden. These tiny dwellers of the natural world with their rainbow wings captured our imagination forever. We sketched the shapes of the garden’s almost heart-shaped pansies and the overlapping petals in nature-like colors, then compared our drawings to the original flowers.
We were not the only ones to enjoy the garden. My mother put her favorite fountain in the middle of that tiny garden. Click on the icon below to listen to the water fountain
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Ecocomposition: Literacy and Ecology
Influenced by today’s readings, I define ecocomposition as a model concerned with the dynamic relationship between writing and the world (natural, imagined, constructed, etc.). It recognizes the importance of the non-human world, emphasizes the domino effect relationship that writers have with ecology, and advances awareness and interaction with natural systems.
Cooper emphasizes the importance of contextualizing the writing process not only in its immediate context, but also in “socially constituted systems” with which the writer is constantly engaged (Ecology 367). The ecological model, as Cooper describes it, encompasses various systems that constitute a web. She compares the product model and the process model that utilize ecology as its main component. The product model emphasizes the finished work while the process model depicts writers engaged in the writing process, affecting their situations and environments and being affected by their environments and the systems they belong to. According to Cooper, the ecological model provides writers with a “real audience” rather than a general, imagined audience. Although she presents a valid argument, I find the concept of “real audience” problematic, since no matter what audience the teacher asks her students to imagine they are writing to, students will write to the teacher. Even while peer-reviewing each other’s essays, students are aware of the fact that the teacher will collect and grade their peer-review sheets. Although the collaboration that takes place in the classroom may seem to address the real audience of peers, the groups or the pairs are producing work to be evaluated by the teacher. Hence, they are writing to the “imagined audience.”
Stretching the boundaries of our discipline to include almost “everything” works both ways. Although this holistic vision makes our discipline more inclusive and more involved in different conversations, that vision jeopardizes the discipline’s existence and questions its validity since including everything in one field may blur the boundaries between disciplines. However, Owens sees this ambiguity as an advantage because such a setting “offers a logical working space for the promotion of sustainable pedagogies” (29).
I find it interesting how the composition class can go beyond the boundaries of its physical place to reach the local community. This localization demands that the writer shapes/ reshapes the writing based on the needs of the community. Students become more involved in their communities when they write about and explore issues related to their communities rather than viewing the university as an institution isolated from the surrounding community. Annie Merrill Ingran believes that the collaboration between the university and the community brings about benefits to both parties: the students witness the importance of writing as a means of affecting the community and the community benefits from the students’ effort to improve the community (Weisser &Dobrin 7). Also, by practicing the ecological model, we expose our students to larger themes than writing per se, such as social justice, and build an appreciation of diversity (Weisser& Dobrin 6).
When you have a diverse class (students from different cultures and backgrounds) their understanding of the environment varies depending on the culture each student belongs to. All cultures do not look at and treat the environment the same way. For example, from my experience here, I’ve noticed that my students get more irritated and annoyed when we watch a YouTube video about animal abuse than if we watch a video about children starving in Africa. Since I come from a culture that values humans more than animals, their reaction to the two videos is perplexing to me. The real challenge in implementing an ecological model is to encourage students to surface different cultural priorities rather than hide such cultural trends/beliefs that don’t conform to the priorities of the mainstream (the dominant culture). Here, Drew’s perception of the student writer as a traveler might be a good way to understand diversity and difference in a multicultural setting. Drew believes that “understanding students as traveling between and dwelling in multiple locations whose discursive pedagogies help to construct them as writers is an important component of what ecocomposition might engender” (62). Drew touches upon the metaphor of the classroom as a “contact zone,” a place where ideologies “clash and grapple with each other.”

“Life in the contact zone is by definition dynamic, heterogeneous, and volatile. Bewilderment and suffering as well as revelation and exhilaration are experienced by everyone, teacher and students, at different moments. No one is excluded, no one is safe.”
--Mary Louise Pratt
I think that in order to better understand the politics of the classroom space, the notion of the “contact zone” should be part of this discussion. Viewing the classroom as a “contact zone” or as a “frontier” highlights the competing ideologies of the students and the teacher that underpin historical, political, and cultural struggles.
Cooper emphasizes the importance of contextualizing the writing process not only in its immediate context, but also in “socially constituted systems” with which the writer is constantly engaged (Ecology 367). The ecological model, as Cooper describes it, encompasses various systems that constitute a web. She compares the product model and the process model that utilize ecology as its main component. The product model emphasizes the finished work while the process model depicts writers engaged in the writing process, affecting their situations and environments and being affected by their environments and the systems they belong to. According to Cooper, the ecological model provides writers with a “real audience” rather than a general, imagined audience. Although she presents a valid argument, I find the concept of “real audience” problematic, since no matter what audience the teacher asks her students to imagine they are writing to, students will write to the teacher. Even while peer-reviewing each other’s essays, students are aware of the fact that the teacher will collect and grade their peer-review sheets. Although the collaboration that takes place in the classroom may seem to address the real audience of peers, the groups or the pairs are producing work to be evaluated by the teacher. Hence, they are writing to the “imagined audience.”
Stretching the boundaries of our discipline to include almost “everything” works both ways. Although this holistic vision makes our discipline more inclusive and more involved in different conversations, that vision jeopardizes the discipline’s existence and questions its validity since including everything in one field may blur the boundaries between disciplines. However, Owens sees this ambiguity as an advantage because such a setting “offers a logical working space for the promotion of sustainable pedagogies” (29).
I find it interesting how the composition class can go beyond the boundaries of its physical place to reach the local community. This localization demands that the writer shapes/ reshapes the writing based on the needs of the community. Students become more involved in their communities when they write about and explore issues related to their communities rather than viewing the university as an institution isolated from the surrounding community. Annie Merrill Ingran believes that the collaboration between the university and the community brings about benefits to both parties: the students witness the importance of writing as a means of affecting the community and the community benefits from the students’ effort to improve the community (Weisser &Dobrin 7). Also, by practicing the ecological model, we expose our students to larger themes than writing per se, such as social justice, and build an appreciation of diversity (Weisser& Dobrin 6).
When you have a diverse class (students from different cultures and backgrounds) their understanding of the environment varies depending on the culture each student belongs to. All cultures do not look at and treat the environment the same way. For example, from my experience here, I’ve noticed that my students get more irritated and annoyed when we watch a YouTube video about animal abuse than if we watch a video about children starving in Africa. Since I come from a culture that values humans more than animals, their reaction to the two videos is perplexing to me. The real challenge in implementing an ecological model is to encourage students to surface different cultural priorities rather than hide such cultural trends/beliefs that don’t conform to the priorities of the mainstream (the dominant culture). Here, Drew’s perception of the student writer as a traveler might be a good way to understand diversity and difference in a multicultural setting. Drew believes that “understanding students as traveling between and dwelling in multiple locations whose discursive pedagogies help to construct them as writers is an important component of what ecocomposition might engender” (62). Drew touches upon the metaphor of the classroom as a “contact zone,” a place where ideologies “clash and grapple with each other.”

“Life in the contact zone is by definition dynamic, heterogeneous, and volatile. Bewilderment and suffering as well as revelation and exhilaration are experienced by everyone, teacher and students, at different moments. No one is excluded, no one is safe.”
--Mary Louise Pratt
I think that in order to better understand the politics of the classroom space, the notion of the “contact zone” should be part of this discussion. Viewing the classroom as a “contact zone” or as a “frontier” highlights the competing ideologies of the students and the teacher that underpin historical, political, and cultural struggles.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
“Unfair” Food

Another point that I find troublesome is while Schneider identifies the problem, he does not offer adequate suggestions to the current dilemma of the industrialized food system. In Food, Inc, we see a Hispanic-American family that can’t afford vegetables and fruits, and therefore choose to eat McDonald’s for dinner over and over again. My question to Stephen Schneider is: how do you fix the problems associated with the industrialized food system? If buying raw food from the supermarket and cooking it at home is the answer, how can a poor family afford to buy fresh ingredients to fix themselves a decent meal?
I question what we call the slow food movement because other cultures have been practicing it for a long time, and it has been part of their system and cultural heritage. The idea of enjoying the food you eat is common in many cultures. For example, in the Japanese culture, tea should be served in a tea ceremony within a specific ritual by a geisha. It is obvious from the video how much tranquility and patience the geisha shows in preparing tea and serving it to her guests.
The following caption appears directly below the video: “The tea ceremony is a way of life based on the act of serving tea with a pure heart. It has its roots in Zen philosophy and is driven by the four ideas of Wa, Kei, Sei, Jaku (Harmony, Respect, Purity, Tranquility). It strives to create a state of mind that brings peace to its participants”
Also, I know that many cultures, such as the Syrian culture, follow similar practices of the slow food movement by encouraging the use of fresh ingredients, maintaining their clean, good food, and combating the harmful effects of globalization by discouraging westernized restaurants like McDonald’s from opening in their country. You rarely come across a western food chain because the Syrian government is aware of the health issues that might result from eating such food. The West blames Syria for not accepting westernized food chains since countries that are not open/ westernized are blamed for oppressing their people and keeping them blind to “progress.”
It is interesting to see how such food related practices can carry with them political and cultural issues. Syrians value taste, pleasure, and design in their food. Not only that, but they know how to make a healthy meal at minimum cost. For example, Syrians are the ones who invented “fattoush.” The true story behind it is that because the pita bread Syrians and Arabs in general use for most of their meals might get hard after a couple of days, Syrians decided to add it to the Arabic salad and call the new dish “fattoush.” By doing so, they don’t have to throw away the pita bread, but instead repurpose it.
These are just a few examples of how other cultures have been employing the practices of the slow food movement before it was identified by Carlo Petrini in the 1970s.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)